This document constitutes an
agreement between you (the “Reader”) and me (the “Site”). It is legally
binding and supersedes all previous and subsequent understandings, expressed
or implied, that may exist between Reader and Site.
Viewing and reading of the Site
is undertaken at the sole discretion of the Reader, who assumes full risk for all
consequences arising therefrom.
Any usage of such words as
“uplifting” and “enlightening” notwithstanding, Site makes no promise as to
the salutary effects of articles or graphics included herein, or of web
pages to which Site is linked.
Site offers no warranty,
expressed or implied, concerning suitability of the included content for the
spiritual elevation of User.
Reader acknowledges that
content of Site may or may not be fully effective in liberation of his/her eternal
spirit.
Reader acknowledges that
exposure to materials of the Site may or may not provide sufficient chi to raise his Kundilini.
A click is a signature, just as
spending money is “speech”, corporations are “persons” and anyone who speaks out
against war is a “terrorist”.
By clicking the box below,
Reader agrees to take full responsibility for his own perspective on the
Universe in each moment, and to arrange that perspective, so far as s/he is
able, in such manner as may be expected to optimize his empowered and
beneficent relationship to all beings,
Intending to be fully bound hereby,
I freely and openly do set my mouse to this clickbox in agreement.
□____________
Reader.
Entered this _ 1st_ day of ____April____, 20 __12__.
1 April 2012
The surprising and enduring efficacy of non-violence
Violence is the means, as all dictators have known, whereby the few
dominate and exploit the many. Nonviolence is the means by which the
many can reclaim their rights and advance their interests. Peace begins,
someone has said, when the hungry are fed. It is equally true that the
hungry will be fed when peace begins. Equality and nonviolence--peace
and justice--are inextricably linked, and neither can flourish in the
absence of the other. Peace, social justice and defense of the
environment are a triad to pit against the imperial triad of war,
economic exploitation and environmental exploitation.
Here was a man who seemed to me to excel all the authors
I had read in conveying the very quality
of life as we live it
from moment to moment, but the wretched fellow, instead
of doing it all directly,
insisted on mediating it through
what I still would have called the ‘Christian mythology.’ – C.S. Lewis
3 April 2012
Dogma is often the corruption of someone else’s spiritual experience.
Belief systems are often the enemy of the very spiritual truths they
supposedly uphold. Most religious beliefs are not merely the foe of
reason, of science. They are the enemy of God; not the man-made tyrant
in the sky, but the very source of life, love, and truth. They are the
enemy of spiritual understanding that would otherwise flow through us
like the blood that circulates through our veins. Dogmatic
presuppositions, drummed into our heads from infancy are like security
blankets that shroud us in relative ignorance, and chain us to our
beast-like tendencies. We are capable of much more. So much more.
— Beau Porden (does anyone know who he is?)
4 April 2012
Guarded optimism
My premise is that the U.S. economy is going to collapse, that this
process has already begun, and will run its course over a decade or
more, with ups and downs here and there, but a consistent overall
downward direction. I neither prognosticate nor wish for such an
outcome; I just happen to see it as very likely. Furthermore, I do not
see it as altogether bad. There are some terrible aspects to the current
state of affairs, and some wonderful aspects to the post-collapse
environment. For example, the air will be much cleaner, there will be no
traffic jams, and people will have plenty of time to devote to their
children and to people within their immediate community. Wildlife will
rebound. Local culture will make a comeback. People will get plenty of
exercise walking around, carrying things, and performing manual labor.
They will eat smaller and healthier diets. I could go on and on...
I have a dream, so allow me to tell a vision. Each year at Passover,
the Jewish people affirm the possibility of the Messiah: ‘Next year in
Jerusalem.’ Next year always comes, and the Messiah never seems to come
with it. Maybe it’s time to make a break with the past and actually act
as if the Messiah is already here. You know, fake it till you make it.
So put it on your calendars. Next year let’s celebrate Past Over in
Jerusalem, and declare that the past is over and a new day has begun.
Hold this vision with me please: Leaders of the Christian, Jewish and
Muslim faiths together in celebration – doing the Hokey Pokey. They put
their whole selves in ... that is commitment. They pull their whole
selves out ... that is detachment. They turn themselves around ... that
is transformation. And that’s what it’s all about!
I have loved colours, and not flowers;
Their motion, not the swallow’s wings;
And wasted more than half my hours
Without the comradeship of things.
How is it, now, that I can see,
With love and wonder and delight,
The children of the hedge and tree,
The little lords of day and night?
How is it that I see the roads,
No longer with usurping eyes,
A twilight meeting-place for toads,
A mid-day mart for butterflies?
I feel, in every midge that hums,
Life, fugitive and infinite,
And suddenly the world becomes
A part of me and I of it.
— Arthur Symons
7 April 2012
A better world is possible
The lion’s share of the world’s bounty is being lost to
violence, corruption, and outright theft. In a peaceful and honest
world, there would be enough to go around. We could live in harmony with
nature and have the comforts we need (though not the waste or the
ostentation).
For most of man’s history, people clamored over one another as a matter
of survival. Later, the clamoring was for comfort and leisure. Now there
is enough that we can all have luxuries. The clamoring that continues is
about prestige and symbols of dominance; not to acquire more for the
victor but to assure that there’s less for the loser. A hopeful tragedy.
The world’s great problems are traceable to a tiny proportion of the
population – well under 1% that are unable to feel empathy or remorse
(or love). Any semblance of democracy would be sufficient to assure a
peaceful and prosperous future for humanity.
— Josh Mitteldorf
8 April 2012
The yoga of sleep
We need to remember that sleep, in addition to providing support to
waking life, is of value in it of itself.
Sleep delivers something important. It takes us to another place in
consciousness.
I deeply believe that sleep has spiritual benefit. It’s a valuable
experience in it of itself.
When we recognize that, we really shift our attitudes towards sleep as
something we can actually enjoy -- not something we simply need to do to
be healthier. ’ ‘’ “”
It is the pre-sentiment that imagination is more real and reality is
less real than it looks. It is the hunch that the overwhelming brutality
of facts that oppress and repress us is not the last word. It is the
suspicion that reality is more complex than the realists want us to
believe. That the frontiers of the possible are not determined by the
limits of the actual. . . . So let us plant dates even though we who
plant them will never eat them. We must live by the love of what we will
never see. That is the secret discipline. It is the refusal to let our
creative act be dissolved away by our need for immediate sense
experience and it is a struggled commitment to the future of our
grandchildren.
of philosophy, (which I don’t distinguish from the classical
mind-body problem, is to understand the relationship between the
mechanical body (chemicals, electric signals) and the subjective
experience (consciousness, qualia, red, cold, pain, orgasm).
Nicholas Humphrey claims* he has a solution to the mind-body
problem, and that they key is to realize that consciousness evolved, and
therefore it most likely confers a selective advantage.
It is fashionable in today’s philosophy of the mind to take as a
starting point that consciousness is a product of the brain or (more
strongly) that it is a product of a certain kind of computation,
irrespective of the substrate in which that computation takes place.
I’m enough of a mystic to wonder whether the relationship isn’t the
other way ’round. Perhaps consciousness precedes matter, and
created an evolutionary process as a path toward connection with the
world of matter, realizing and enriching its content and extending its
reach. I wonder why this perspective isn’t discussed more in the
contemporary literature of philosophy.
I think of the paradigm in which physical reality is primary and our
consciousness is secondary as a social construct, a result of attitudes
rooted in the physics of the late 19th century. Contemporary
philosophy has abandoned the
animism that
seemed a natural framework for human thought over thousands of years, as
well as the
idealism of Plato and the
deism that
was popular during the Enlightment. But most philosophers have yet
to embrace the results of twentieth century physics especially quantum
mechanics in which ‘objective’ physical reality becomes an
approximation, at best.
Much of the isolation and alienation of modern society, the
foundationlessness and absurdity that we experience, are traceable to
this perspective in which we are separate agents that popped out of a
Darwinian process, each bearing a selfish agenda.† Not to mention
the excesses of capitalism, which has brought us so much comfort and
entertainment, so little satisfaction and fulfillment.
Before Rachel Carson founded a revolution, in an era when ‘progress’
was rarely questioned, Aldo Leopold promoted a aesthetic culture of the
land and an ethic of conservation.
‘We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us.
When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use
it with love and respect.’
— from
A Sand County Almanac
‘We reached the old wolf in time to see a fierce,
green fire dying in her eyes. I was young then and full of trigger
itch. I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, no
wolves would mean hunters’ paradise, but after seeing the green fire
die, I saw that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a
view.’
12 April 2012
Every war is an outrage
John Horgan discusses the logic with David Swanson. There is no
excuse for war. It is never the will of the majority. It is
never about real threats that can only be countered with violence.
It is always the leaders consolidating their power and the corporations
fattening their profits. When
we are in touch with our outrage, war must cease. War will cease.
13 April 2012
Bach in Brazil
Villa-Lobos wanted to translate Bach’s contrapuntal style into Latin
rhythms. The result was a series of 9 works which he scored for
various combinations of piano, cello and orchestra.
My hotel is on a street named 13 de Maio for the day in
1888 when slavery was outlawed in Brazil. The street is busy with
cars, and not one of them is blue or green. Taxis are white, and the
rest come in black and various shades of gray.
It is the people of Brazil who are colorful. Back in the 16th
century when Brazil was being settled, the indigenous peoples were less
efficiently extinguished than in North America. Brave Jesuits
convinced the colonists that brown-skinned natives were not like the
black Africans, who could be enslaved with a clear conscience. The
American natives, but not the Africans, were deemed to have souls. Today there are
Whites and Asians and native Americans, but mostly there are striking
mixtures. European features with black
skin. African features with white skin. Short and tall, curly and
straight. On park benches, inter-racial couples are kissing
passionately. I’m told that there are still privileges for white people
here, and that it’s harder for darker people to be taken seriously, but
that there is no racial hatred or racial violence. There was no
civil war in 1888. What a difference
intermarriage makes!
The lake in the Parque do Ibirapuera is full of swans, and
every one is black.
— Josh Mitteldorf
15 April 2012
The 9th Precept
Do not say untruthful things for the sake of personal interest or to
impress people. Do not utter words that cause division and hatred. Do
not spread news that you do not know to be certain.
Do not criticize or condemn things of which you are not sure. Always
speak truthfully and constructively. Have the courage to speak out about
situations of injustice, even when doing so may threaten your own
safety.
It’s so easy to agree in principle that truth has an absolute claim
on us, but so difficult to practice truth at times when it is
embarrassing, at times when , and when we know that a shading of the
truth is a shortcut that will get the right result without having to
change our listeners’ fundamental beliefs.
But Thich is also telling us that just because something is true does
not mean it should be spoken (Precept 3). And just because we now
think that it is true does not mean that we are correct.
(Precept 2).
16 April 2012
Morning poem
Every morning
the world
is created.
Under the orange
sticks of the sun
the heaped
ashes of the night
turn into leaves again
and fasten themselves to the high branches —
and the ponds appear
like black cloth
on which are painted islands
of summer lilies.
If it is your nature
to be happy
you will swim away along the soft trails
for hours, your imagination
alighting everywhere.
And if your spirit
carries within it
the thorn
that is heavier than lead —
if it’s all you can do
to keep on trudging —
there is still
somewhere deep within you
a beast shouting that the earth
is exactly what it wanted —
each pond with its blazing lilies
is a prayer heard and answered
lavishly,
every morning,
whether or not
you have ever dared to be happy,
whether or not
you have ever dared to pray.
Instead of being kicked out for fighting, stealing, talking back, or
other disruptive behavior, public school students in San Francisco are
being asked to listen to each other, write letters of apology, work out
solutions with the help of parents and educators, or engage in community
service. All these practices fall under the umbrella of “restorative
justice”—asking wrongdoers to make amends before resorting to
punishment.
The program launched in 2009 when the San Francisco Board of Education
passed a resolution for schools to find alternatives to suspension and
expulsion. In the previous seven years, suspensions in San Francisco
spiked by 152 percent, to a total of 4,341—mostly among African
Americans, who despite being one-tenth of the district made up half of
suspensions and more than half of expulsions.
...
“In restorative justice, you have to actually have the offender and
the victim sit down and discuss what happened and how the offender can
make it better.” Fewer and Kim, along with colleague Kim–Shree
Maufas, led the three-year process for the board to officially adopt
restorative justice. Though the task force charged with implementing the
policy received only modest funding, expulsions have fallen 28 percent
since its inception. Less serious cases have shown even more success.
Non-mandatory referrals for expulsion (those not involving drugs,
violence or sexual assault) have plunged 60 percent, and suspensions are
down by 35 percent.
A lot of my readers say their job lacks excitement
Are you bored at work? Tired of the same old same old?
Looking for a more exciting way to put food on your table? Well, here’s a suggestion for one way to make a living: These
Bororo tribesmen
from Cameroon
approach a pride of lions sharing their fresh kill and spook them with
bright colors and big sticks, just long enough to cut a prime slice off
the carcass.
An account of one particular incident where local villagers
were caught stealing meat from a lion kill has been published in the African Journal of Ecology.
Large predators, such as lions, spotted hyenas,
African wild dogs and cheetahs routinely steal fresh kills from one
another, a behaviour known as kleptoparasitism...the practise of
[people] stealing lion kills may be more
prevalent than thought.
‘From interviews with Bororo herdsmen, we have
learned that it is a common habit among this tribe to chase away lions
from fresh kills, with sticks or with fire,’ says
Hans de Iongh of Leiden University.
The basic principle is simple: the bigger the star, the stronger the
gravity, the faster planets must whirl about it to keep their
equilibrium. This idea has been used by astronomers for about the
last 80 years—backwards—in order to infer the mass of galaxies and star
clusters from speed measurements, made for individual stars.
In many, many such measurements, astronomers have found that there is
more mass out there than they can account for. The mass inferred
from gravitational speeds is about 5 times more than they get adding up
the masses of stars and interstellar gas.
This fact has been built into the modern understanding of the Big
Bang. The standard model of the Big Bang includes 80% of the mass
of the universe in a form that is unknown and mysterious. (It is
not ordinary matter (electrons, neutrons and protons, etc.) because that
would have shown up in the amount of helium generated in the first 3 minutes
of the BB.)
But whatever that ‘dark matter’ was, the cosmic theorists thought
they understood how it behaved, and how it helped to supply the glue
that pulls galaxies together.
This week, that picture has begun to unravel. A series of
measurements of velocities of hundreds of stars in the vicinity of the
Earth looked for the dark matter that was supposed to be in our
neighborhood. But there seems to be no evidence of dark matter
here, where it’s easiest to look. The dark matter has gone
missing.
Astronomers are caught without an explanation. There is no
alternative hypothesis that could reconcile what we already know about
the big bang with the failure to see dark matter. It’s time to go
back to the drawing board.
It is now more than a century since the learned French sinologist Deguignes set forth, in a very ably-written paper in the Mémoires
de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres’
(vol. xxviii., 1761), the fact that he had found in the works of early
Chinese historians a statement that, in the fifth century of our era,
certain travellers of their race had discovered a country which they
called Fusang, and which, from the direction and distance as described
by them, appeared to be Western America, and in all probability Mexico.
When Deguignes wrote, his resources, both as regards the knowledge of
the region supposed to have been discovered and the character of the
travellers, were extremely limited, so that the skill with which he
conducted his investigation, and the shrewdness of his conjectures,
render his memoir, even to the present day, a subject of commendation
among scholars. Few men have ever done so much or as well with such
scanty and doubtful material. The original document on which the
Chinese historians based their account of Fusang was the report of a
Buddhist monk or missionary named Hoei-shin (Schin or Shên), who, in the
year 499 A.D., returned from a long journey to the East. This report was
regularly entered on the Year-Books or Annals of the Chinese Empire,
whence it passed, not only to the pages of historians, but also to those
of poets and writers of romances..
...the voyage of Hoei-shin forms a portion of the somewhat
extensive literature of travel of Buddhist monks, the authenticity of
which has been vindicated by Stanislas Julien...
— from the preface to a book called
Fusang, by
George Leland (1875)
Wikipedia says:
The American hypothesis was the most hotly debated one in the late
19th and early 20th century after the 18th century writings of Joseph de
Guignes were revived and disseminated by Charles Godfrey Leland in 1875.
Sinologists including Emil Bretschneider, Berthold Laufer, and Henri
Cordier refuted however this hypothesis, and according to Needham the
American thesis was ‘stone dead’ by the time of the First World War.
21 April 2012
I teach in order to learn from my own lips what it is that I most
value, and what I deeply believe.
— Josh Mitteldorf
22 April 2012
Fiction
after Mohammed Iqbal
‘Why didn’t you make me eternal?’
Beauty asked God one day,
who replied: ‘The world’s fiction
is carved from nothingness.
In changing colors you were born:
true beauty is ephemeral.’
The moon overheard this dialogue,
beamed it to the morning star
who woke the dawn, whispering sky’s secret
to the dewdrop, earth’s guardian.
Dew drenched the rose petals,
and Spring left the garden weeping.
— Mohammed Iqbal (1877 -1938), one of the two great South Asian poets of
the
20th Century (the other was Faiz Ahmed Faiz), advocated ceaseless
endeavor,
writing with equal ease in Persian, Urdu, and English. He was knighted
by the
British but is rarely called Sir Mohammed.
Translated from the Urdu by Rafiq Kathwari, guest poet at
3Quarks Daily.
23 April 2012
Distinguishing Wealth from Wellbeing
Imagine a world where the metric that guides our decisions is not
money, but happiness. That is the future that 650 political, academic,
and civic leaders from around the world came together to promote on
April 2, 2012. Encouraged by the government of Bhutan, the United
Nations held a High Level Meeting for Wellbeing and Happiness: Defining
a New Economic Paradigm. The meeting marks the launch of a global
movement to shift our focus away from measuring and promoting economic
growth as a goal in its own right, and toward the goal of measuring—and
increasing—human happiness and quality of life. Some may say these 650
world leaders are dreamers, but they are the sort that can make dreams
come true. The meeting began with an address by Prime Minister Jigmi
Thinley of Bhutan, where the government tracks the nation’s “Gross
National Happiness”:
“The time has come for global action to build a new world economic
system that is no longer based on the illusion that limitless growth is
possible on our precious and finite planet or that endless material gain
promotes well-being. Instead, it will be a system that promotes harmony
and respect for nature and for each other; that respects our ancient
wisdom traditions and protects our most vulnerable people as our own
family, and that gives us time to live and enjoy our lives and to
appreciate rather than destroy our world. It will be an economic system,
in short, that is fully sustainable and that is rooted in true, abiding
well-being and happiness.”
DESIRE we past illusions to recall?
To reinstate wild Fancy, would we hide
Truths whose thick veil Science has drawn aside?
No,—let this Age, high as she may, instal
In her esteem the thirst that wrought man’s fall,
The universe is infinitely wide;
And conquering Reason, if self-glorified,
Can nowhere move uncrossed by some new wall
Or gulf of mystery, which thou alone,
Imaginative Faith! canst overleap,
In progress toward the fount of Love,—the throne
Of Power whose ministers the records keep
Of periods fixed, and laws established, less
Flesh to exalt than prove its nothingness.
We look with contemptuous self-satisfaction at the obese woman
loading her supermarket cart with potato chips. We cluck at the
wanton self-disrespect of so-and-so’s promiscuous sister, and shake our
heads in censorious disapproval at the latest statistics for marital
infidelity.
In juding others there is a sense of self-affirmation, a self-image
built from ‘I would never do that’. In that statement is coded a
profound lack of unconditional self-acceptance, and the secret
dreat that, Yes, I would in fact do that, or even the shameful
knowledge: I have done that before.
When you put yourself fully in another’s place, imagine what it is
like to be them, and feel what they feel, there is no possibility of
judgmentality. Others will sense that, and trust you, and be
amazed that you know things about them they have never told you.
Herein also lies humility, a sincere humility arising simply from an
understanding of the fact: ‘I would surely do as you do, if I were you.’
Do not tell yourself that you shouldn’t be
judgmental. You’ll tie yourself up in knots, because when you
dig down into what
shouldn’t means you will very likely discover an implicit judgment
of judgmental people.
26 April 2012
Fortune cookie
You will bring humanity into contact with eternal truth hundreds of
years ahead of what would have been possible without your effort...You
embody God’s grace.
When a scientist plies her trade with sufficient breadth of
observation and an open mind, she gradually comes to realize how paltry
are man’s theories in comparison to the rich wonders of nature. This is
the cognitive path to mysticism.
This is not the only path, but it is perhaps the most surprising.
For me, it is an ongoing source of paradox and wonder.
~ Josh Mitteldorf
29 April 2012
No relationship can be secure. If it is secure, it will lose all charm, all
attraction. The mind cannot be satisfied with this. It wants
a relationship that is both alive and secure, but his is not possible.
Anything that is alive - a person or an animal or plant or relationship
- has to be unpredictable. What is going to happen in the next
moment is un-knowable.