Grace takes the form of methane
Warnings that we humans are hogging more than our share of the earth’s
resources and collectively making the place less livable have been in
our face for decades, if not centuries. The need for collective
global action has been obvious, while we as a species have equivocated,
temporized and denied.
Now comes reprieve we have not earned in the form of a little more
time to get our act together. The
Marcellus
Shale runs through Appalachia, from Eastern Tennessee up through mid
New York State, and was surveyed last year to contain perhaps 50
trillion cu ft of recoverable natural gas, clean energy with much less
CO2 per joule than
coal.
Let’s use this reprieve wisely.
|
1 October 2009

|
Gandhi on Love
Fear and love are contradictory terms. Love is reckless in giving away,
oblivious as to what it gets in return. Love wrestles with the world as
with the self and ultimately gains mastery over all other feelings. My
daily experience, as of those who are working with me, is that every
problem lends itself to solution if we are determined to make the law of
truth and non-violence the law of life. For truth and non-violence are,
to me, faces of the same coin. The law of love will work, just as the
law of gravitation will work, whether we accept it or not.
—
Mahatma Gandhi turns 140 years old today
|
2 October 2009

|
Harvest moon
The Hindoos compare the moon to a saintly being who has reached the
last stage of bodily existence. Great restorer of antiquity, great
enchanter! In a mild night when the harvest or hunter’s moon shines
unobstructedly, the houses in our village, whatever architect they may
have had by day, acknowledge only a master. The village street is then
as wild as the forest. New and old things are confounded. I know not
whether I am sitting on the ruins of a wall, or on the material which is
to compose a new one. Nature is an instructed and impartial teacher,
spreading no crude opinions, and flattering none; she will be neither
radical nor conservative. Consider the moonlight, so civil, yet so
savage!
— Henry David Thoreau
|
3 October 2009

|
Decisions
Much of our anxiety about decisions derives from frustration
that the available choices do not include what we really want – a
refusal to accept the limitations of our power in the situation. The
other usual source of discomfort with decision-making is uncertainty
about the future: if only we knew better what was coming, it would be
easy to decide how to prepare for it.
It is often helpful to go through a process of exploring these feelings
aloud. Also helpful is to imagine in fantasy all the expected
possibilities, how we might feel with each. Even better is to focus on
possible surprise or unexpected
outcomes.
The decision itself is best left up to the unconscious. Instead of
asking, nervously, ‘what shall I do?’, we ask, curiously, ‘I wonder what
I shall decide to do’. We step back from the decision-making process,
and watch it until we no longer feel uncertainty about what that
decision will be. Accept that we will continue continue to feel
ambivalence long after the decision is made.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
4 October 2009

|
Destin
Faute de savoir ce qui est écrit là-haut, on ne sait ni ce qu’on veut
ni ce qu’on fait, et qu’on suit sa fantaisie qu’on appelle raison, ou sa
raison qui n’est souvent qu’une dangereuse fantaisie qui tourne tantôt bien,
tantôt mal.
Ignorant of what fate has in store for us, we cannot know what we are
doing or even what we really want, so we follow that which we call
‘reason’ which often is but a dangerous fantasy, sometimes
turning out well, sometimes rather badly.
—
Denis Diderot, born this day in 1713, was a French novelist,
philosopher and author of L’Encyclopédie (1751–1772), epitomizing the
spirit of Enlightenment thought. Much more than a work of
reference, L’Encyclopédie became a program for change, transferring
knowledge and authority from the clerical to the secular domains; with
its publication, religion and irreligion became polarized and the
various shades of distinction within Deism and natural religion began to
disappear.
Est-ce qu’on est maître de devenir ou de ne pas devenir amoureux?
Et quand on l’est, est-on maître d’agir comme si on ne l’était pas?
Do we have anything to say about whether we fall in
love? And should we fall in love, do we have any choice but to follow?
Both quotations are from
Jacques, the
Fatalist, a novel about fate that is both funny and deep.
|
5 October 2009

|
Whatever it takes
In psychological experiments conducted at UC Santa Barbara,
Travis Proulx
has found that
reading Kafka enhances the mind’s ability to perceive new patterns,
even when those patterns are unconsciously appreciated, and not
articulated.
It’s an interesting result, and convention dictates that Proulx gets
first crack at telling us what it means. Is this, as the author
claims, a benefit of confronting the absurd, forcing the mind into a
mode where it casts a wider net in search of reason and order?
Drawing us into paradox is a mark of great art. We all
recognize the utility of keeping our minds fresh, avoiding the
dismissive response, renewing our capacity for creativity. My take
on this is that there is no formula for stimulating our creativity.
It is exciting that some correlates of creativity can be measured, but
the ability to enhance creativity defies quantification and is, in fact,
a mark of high art.
—
Article in Science Times
|
6 October 2009

|
There are the rushing waves...
mountains of molecules,
each stupidly minding its own business...
trillions apart
...yet forming white surf in unison.
Ages on ages...
before any eyes could see...
year after year...
thunderously pounding the shore as now.
For whom, for what?
...on a dead planet
with no life to entertain.
Never at rest...
tortured by energy...
wasted prodigiously by the sun...
poured into space.
A mite makes the sea roar.
Deep in the sea,
all molecules repeat
the patterns of another
till complex new ones are formed.
They make others like themselves...
and a new dance starts.
|
Growing in size and complexity...
living things,
masses of atoms,
DNA, protein...
dancing a pattern ever more intricate.
Out of the cradle
onto dry land...
here it is standing...
atoms with consciousness
...matter with curiosity.
Stands at the sea...
wonders at wondering... I...
a universe of atoms...
an atom in the universe.
—
Richard Feynman (1955)
1918-1988,
Nobel Prize in physics,1965
|
|
7 October 2009

|
Animal talk
Perhaps it’s a conceit to imagine that language belongs exclusively
to humans. So far, we have decoded only a few of their ‘words’.
We presume that the language is limited to a few warning calls, but we
really don’t know how extensive or how nuanced it is. A few years
ago, we would have said there is no language at all. Best studied
are warning cries, because we can see the behaviors that they elicit.
There is a powerful selective incentive to develop recognition of
warning cries, so we shouldn’t be surprised if these are the first
language that animals exhibit. But is there more? Are there
dozens or hundreds of unique sounds in their vocabularies? Is
there a grammar that expands the range of meaning with context?
Apes and monkeys are close enough to humans that we can easily
imagine a complex sociality. But birds with their tiny brains
seem, if anything, more adapted for verbalization. And dolphins’
language is known to be rich and varied, but thus far un-decoded by man.
Olivia Judson, blogging in the NYTimes this week, tells us about
animal cries. Jungle animals are polyglots, and can understand the
cries of other species:
Diana monkeys, for example, don’t use the same sounds
for “eagle!” or “leopard!” as Campbell’s monkeys do. But they respond to
recordings of a Campbell’s monkey shouting “eagle!” or “leopard!” just
as they would to a shout from one of their own, or a sighting of the
predator itself.
Judson describes the little that is known about how animal groups
teach their young to talk:
Young vervet monkeys, for example, appear to have an
innate tendency to shout “eagle!” — but they do it at anything that’s in
the air, be it an eagle, a vulture or a falling leaf. They shout
“snake!” at long, thin things on the ground — like twigs. As they get
older they learn to refine their calls. This seems to be through
positive reinforcement — when they make the right call, adults join in
and do it too. (It’s tempting to think there may be negative
reinforcement as well. One researcher reported seeing a mother run up a
tree after her infant gave a “leopard!” alarm. But there was no leopard
— only a harmless mongoose — and when the mother caught up with the
infant, she gave it a smack.)
Link to Judson’s column
|
8 October 2009

|
Nobel Prizes for Peace
“Thinking too well of people often allows them to be better than they
otherwise would be.”
— Nelson Mandela
|
9 October 2009

|
Shhh!
Every word is an unnecessary stain on silence and nothingness.
— Sameul Beckett
I shall state silences more competently than
ever a better man spangled the butterflies of vertigo.
|
10 October 2009

|
Creativity is the wild beast that gnaws at your soul. To
harness your will to the tiger, to ride it through the jungle is the
very essence of what it is to be alive.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
11 October 2009

|
Breeding for tameness is remarkably effective.
Dmitri Belyaev
showed that in a small number of generations, foxes could be made as
cuddly and eager for human affection as dogs.
Perhaps we are also a product of domestication.
Over the last 30,000 years, human brain size*, tooth size, and jaw size
have all been on the decrease — exactly the same kind of changes that
have occurred as animals such as dogs were domesticated, says
Richard Wrangham, a biological anthropologist at Harvard. This raises the
intriguing possibility that humans have been on an evolutionary journey
from aggressive chimpanzee-like ancestor to the relatively tame species
we are today. If this is the case, who did the domesticating?
The answer, suggests Wrangham, is that we did. Humans, he argues,
are ‘self-domesticated apes’, with natural selection favoring
individuals that showed tame and cooperative behavior, and weeding out
the more aggressive and antagonistic among us.
—
New Scientist article
* Surely this is a misprint, and brain size is
increasing, even as teeth and jaws grow smaller. —JJM
|
12 October 2009

|
The Physics of Fate
The Large Hadron Collider failed because the
Higgs Boson doesn’t wish
to be discovered.
Surely this is the kind of thinking that primitive philosophers
invoked in ancient times. Banished by the Enlightenment,
teleological thinking has long ago been routed out of the halls of
Science.
Think again. The phenomena of physics have led us to such a
strange place that brilliant and straight-faced mainstream scientists
talk about Fate.
“It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall
have bad luck,” says Holger Bech Nielsen, of the Niels
Bohr Institute in Copenhagen.
article in Science Times today
|
13 October 2009

|
Dust
Congregated in loops of dirt and hair
beneath the dresser, raining down
in shafts jabbed through vinyl slats
of shades that on closer inspection
are coated filmy enough to rub off
on the fingers, rolling from unpaved
roads in clouds, particles quivering
in the atmosphere to form nuclei
for condensing raindrops, gossamer
chaperone trailing tippet to comets,
absorbing and reddening starlight,
mote chanced to be born, like us.
—
Ravi Shankar (unrelated to the musician)
Poets.org essay
by Shankar on abstraction
|
14 October 2009

|
Compassion and the Dismal Science
“We all agree that pessimism is a mark of superior intellect.”
—
John Kenneth Galbraith was born 101 years ago today
“Faced with the choice between changing one’s
mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on
the proof.”
|
15 October 2009

|
Half life
We walk through half our life
as if it were a fever dream
barely touching the ground
our eyes half open
our heart half closed.
Not half knowing who we are
we watch the ghost of us drift
from room to room
through friends and lovers
never quite as real as advertised.
Not saying half we mean
or meaning half we say
we dream ourselves
from birth to birth
seeking some true self.
Until the fever breaks
and the heart can not abide
a moment longer
as the rest of us awakens,
summoned from the dream,
not half caring for anything but love.
~ Stephen Levine ~
from Joe Riley at Panhala once
again
|
16 October 2009

|
Man’s Place in the Universe
Over billions of years, life has transformed the chemical face of the
Earth. Over thousands of years (but accelerating in the last 100),
human life has transformed both the Earth and the biosphere. As
genetic engineering continues to advance, it seems likely that man will
also transform his own biology.
Will the successors of humankind go on to transform our Galaxy for
their own habitation? The Universe is far larger than the Earth, but the
available time is also far longer than the few decades in which
technology has developed.
This slide show offers some perspective on the future of the
Universe, starting with our small corner. The premise (if I may
give away the punch line in the last slide) is that our legacy may be
destined to become an organized intergalactic community that takes
control of the evolution of the cosmos, and that we could shoot all that
to hell if we as a species don’t manage to survive the next century.
I actually find the premise that life’s progeny will someday take
control of the motions of stars and galaxies more plausible than the
idea that the next century on Earth is crucial. We don’t know if
intelligent life is evolving or has evolved elsewhere, and we don’t know
if intelligent civilizations would evolve a second or third or hundredth
time on Earth should the first few attempts prove too violent or
insufficiently communal to manage an ecosystem that can support us.
Slide show:
http://thefutureofourworld.ytmnd.com/
|
17 October 2009

|
May illusion be swept aside, uncovering joy.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
18 October 2009

|
A scientist discovers something marvelous and loses her
objectivity
Irene Pepperberg is a psychologist who claims to find meaning,
intention and reason in the speech of parrots. Alex was her
star pupil.
Dr Pepperberg’s pioneering research resulted
in Alex learning elements of English speech to identify 50 different
objects, 7 colours, 5 shapes, quantities up to and including 6 and a
zero-like concept. He used phrases such as ‘I want X’ and ‘Wanna go Y,’
where X and Y were appropriate object and location labels. He acquired
concepts of categories, bigger and smaller, same-different, and absence.
Alex combined his labels to identify, request, refuse, and categorise
more than 100 different items demonstrating a level and scope of
cognitive abilities never expected in an avian species. Pepperberg says
that Alex showed the emotional equivalent of a 2 year-old child and
intellectual equivalent of a 5 year-old. Her research with Alex
shattered the generally held notion that parrots are only capable of
mindless vocal mimicry.
Article at Science Centric
Pepperblog’s memories of Alex in Discover Magazine
NYTimes review of Alex and Me
more scientific descriptions in the book
The Alex Studies
|
19 October 2009

|
Among the rocks
Oh, good gigantic smile o’ the brown old earth,
This autumn morning! How he sets his bones
To bask i’ the sun, and thrusts out knees and feet
For the ripple to run over in its mirth;
Listening the while, where on the heap of stones
The white breast of the sea-lark twitters sweet.
That is the doctrine, simple, ancient, true;
Such is life’s trial, as old earth smiles and knows.
If you loved only what were worth your love,
Love were clear gain, and wholly well for you:
Make the low nature better by your throes!
Give earth yourself, go up for gain above!
— Robert Browning
|
20 October 2009

|
Mortification of the flesh, masochism, and self-mutilation
explained
‘Real pain can alone cure us of imaginary ills. We feel a thousand
miseries till we are lucky enough to feel misery.’
— Samuel Taylor
Coleridge, born this day in 1772
...through caverns measurelss to man, down to a
sunless sea.
|
21 October 2009

|
Does biology exploit quantum duality? Do our brains?
Quantum duality is part of the weirdness of quantum mechanics.
There is more information in every packet of energy than is available
when that packet is absorbed or detected. The extra information is
in the form of ‘wave phase’, which can’t be measured directly, but it
determines the way a quantum interacts with other quanta.
Quantum computers use this principle to process information in
parallel, which can, in theory achieve efficiencies vastly greater than
any classical computer could attain.
One of the great questions of philosophy of mind, in my opinion, is
whether our brains are quantum computers. If so, this could
certainly explain intuition and the ability to arrive at answers without
knowing where they came from. It might even explain telepathy and
precognition. But the idea that the brain uses QM has been deeply
controversial. Roger
Penrose, one of the smartest people in the universe, has argued
powerfully for ‘yes’, based on detailed arguments from the structure of
neurons.
Max Tegmark,
a younger physics genius who may well be in Penrose’s league, argues
just as forcefully for ‘no’.
Now Scientific American reports on the work of Gregory Engel (at
UChicago) to the effect that green plants use quantum mechanics in
absorbing light, deciding how best to use each photon before committing to how
the photon will be routed and where it will be absorbed. This
makes plausible then general idea that natural selection has been smart
enough to exploit QM where it can gain an advantage that way.
Scientific American article on quantum data processing in plants
Wikipedia article on
Quantum Mind
|
22 October 2009

|
My delight and thy delight
MY delight and thy delight
Walking, like two angels white,
In the gardens of the night:
My desire and thy desire
Twining to a tongue of fire,
Leaping live, and laughing higher:
Thro’ the everlasting strife
In the mystery of life.
Love, from whom the world begun,
Hath the secret of the sun.
Love can tell, and love alone,
Whence the million stars were strewn,
Why each atom knows its own,
How, in spite of woe and death,
Gay is life, and sweet is breath:
This he taught us, this we knew,
Happy in his science true,
Hand in hand as we stood
’Neath the shadows of the wood,
Heart to heart as we lay
In the dawning of the day.
— Robert Bridges,
born this day in 1844
|
23 October 2009

|
Brother Sun and all God’s creatures
“I am a religious Russian Orthodox person and I understand ‘religion’ in
the literal meaning of the word, as ‘re-ligio’, that is to say the
restoration of connections, the restoration of the ‘legato’ of life.
There is no more serious task for music than this.”
Sofia Gubaidulina, 78 years old today, continues to conceive some of
the most interesting sounds in music.
The Canticle of the Sun, also known as the Laudes Creaturarum
(‘Praise of the Creatures’), is a religious song composed by Saint
Francis of Assisi. It was written in the Umbrian dialect of Italian but
has since been translated into many languages. It is believed to be
among the first works of literature, if not the first, written in the
Italian language.
Gubaidulina created a setting of the
Canticle
for cello, choir, and percussion, as a birthday present
for Mstislav Rostropovich in 1997.
All praise is yours, all glory, all honor, and all blessing.
To you, alone, Most High, do they belong.
No mortal lips are worthy to pronounce your name.
Be praised, my Lord, through all your creatures,
especially through my lord Brother Sun,
who brings the day; and you give light through him.
And he is beautiful and radiant in all his splendor!
Of you, Most High, he bears the likeness.
Be praised, my Lord, through Sister Moon and the stars;
in the heavens you have made them bright, precious and beautiful.
Be praised, my Lord, through Brothers Wind and Air,
and clouds and storms, and all the weather,
through which you give your creatures sustenance.
Listen with headphones, undistracted to the
closing
movement of the Canticle, performed by Rostropovich and friends.
|
24 October 2009

|
Circularity
Since virtue is its own reward, often the most virtuous thing we can
do is to create an opportunity for someone to offer a kindness to
ourselves,
or to another.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
25 October 2009

|
How to be happy
We do not know that all is hopeless, we just conclude it from time to
time, based on our emotional state, not our knowledge. Having sufficient
humility to recaognize that we do not know is a key stepping stone to
improving our wellbeing.
...The first premise of this inquiry is that we improve our chances
by affirmatively seeking to understand. By not becoming tired,
satisfied, or complacent. This is a pursuit that does not involve a
competition for resources. We all have the power to improve our
understanding and improve our lives. But we must keep asking questions.
The second premise of this inquiry is that ... we must each develop
our own theory of happiness, figure out what it might look like, and
then test it, continuously, throughout our lives.
A third premise, perhaps most important, is that the mere fact that
we have tried and failed so many times tells us nothing. It is the
spirit of inquiry that matters. ... If we preserve a spirit of inquiry,
this spirit itself is quite directly connected to, and a harbinger of,
happiness. The spirit of inquiry requires self-doubt – not a lack of
self-esteem; but, rather, the recognition that all of our understanding
is provisional, and all of our understanding is susceptible to
improvement.
— from
Ehard’s Blog
|
26 October 2009

|
How life began
In one of the best science articles I’ve seen in many a year,
Nick
Lane pulls together several strands of evidence to propose some new
twists in the story of the origin of life.
The major new clue is about energy metabolism. The life with
which we are familiar today depends (ultimately) on sunlight for energy;
but photosynthesis is complicated, and it is clear that it developed
much later in life’s history. Lane takes a clue from the
unexpected way that life stores energy, using not chemical bonds but
electrochemistry. Pumping hydrogen ions across a membrane is a
process common to all of life, from bacteria to
archaea
to eukaryotes
(that’s us).
Perhaps life began in a place where electrochemical energy was free
and plentiful, where acid welled up from vents deep in the ocean, and
where rocks were perforated with tiny pores, providing catalysis,
protection and a basis for competition, before cell membranes were
‘invented’.
Read the whole story in New Scientist magazine
Buy Nick Lane’s book on 10 greatest inventions of evolution
|
27 October 2009

|
Where were you when the Velociraptors ambushed the
Diplodocus?
When you were a tadpole and I was a fish
In the Paleozoic time,
And side by side on the ebbing tide
We sprawled through the ooze and slime,
Or skittered with many a caudal flip
Through the depths of the Cambrian fen,
My heart was rife with the joy of life,
For I loved you even then.
Mindless we lived and mindless we loved
And mindless at last we died;
And deep in the rift of the Caradoc drift
We slumbered side by side.
The world turned on in the lathe of time,
The hot lands heaved amain,
Till we caught our breath from the womb of death
And crept into light again.
We were amphibians, scaled and tailed,
And drab as a dead man's hand;
We coiled at ease ’neath the dripping trees
Or trailed through the mud and sand.
Croaking and blind, with our three-clawed feet,
Writing a language dumb,
With never a spark in the empty dark
To hint at a life to come.
Loud I howled through the moonlit wastes,
Loud answered our kith and kin;
From west to east to the crimson feast
The clan came tramping in.
O’er joint and gristle and padded bone
We fought and clawed and tore,
And cheek by jowl with many a growl
We talked the marvel o’er.
I carved the fight on a reindeer bone
With rude and hairy hand;
I pictured his fall on the cavern wall
That men might understand.
For we lived by blood and the right of might
Ere human laws were drawn,
And the age of sin did not begin
Till our brutal tush were gone.
Our trail is on the Kimmeridge clay
And the scarp of the Purbeck flags;
We have left our bones in the Bagshot stones
And deep in the Coralline crags;
Our love is old, our lives are old,
And death shall come amain;
Should it come today, what man may say
We shall not live again?
— Excerpted from Evolution by
Langdon Smith
|
28 October 2009

|
You can’t have one without the other
“It was out of the rind of one apple tasted that good and evil leapt
forth into the world, like two twins cleaving together.”
–
Paul Auster, in a fictional quote from
Milton’s Paradise Lost
In my meditation this morning, I realized for the first time that
I like exhaling better than inhaling.
– JJM
|
29 October 2009

|
The universe began as an undifferentiated gas. Why didn’t
it stay that way?
In the Big Bang theory, the Universe started out in ‘thermodynamic equilibrium’, the
state of maximum entropy, meaning that there was no physical motive for
change. Another way to say this is that there was no usable
energy, and no information. Nothing interesting could happen.
Well, a lot of interesting stuff happened after that. How did
the Universe go from a state of maximum entropy to a state of low
entropy, enabling galaxies, stars and life?
It all came from the expansion. One way to describe what
happened is that the maximum entropy of the expanding Universe got
bigger faster than the actual entropy could keep up. Another way
to describe it is that gravitational collapse has the potential to
release enormous amounts of energy that aren’t part of the original
entropy calculation.
The paradox just described is intimately related to another deep
question in physics: why time is ‘directional’. Left and right,
forward and backward are arbitrary directions in space, but ‘before’ and
‘after’ are physically quite different.
If the Universe were contracting, would we experience time going
backward, so we would say it was expanding? Believe it or not,
this is a deep question, on which physicists can disagree.
Watch
Sean Carroll talk about the arrow of time, why it is mysterious, and
where he thinks it comes from.
His book, From
Eternity to Here
(Carroll’s view is that the arrow of time comes from cosmology and
the nature of the Big Bang. I think he’s wrong and the arrow of
time comes from quantum mechanics. Neither of us is sure.
-JJM)
|
30 October 2009

|
Ode on a Grecian Urn
I
Thou still unravish’d bride of quietness,
Thou foster-child of silence and slow time,
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
What leaf-fring’d legend haunts about thy shape
Of deities or mortals, or of both,
In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
What men or gods are these? What maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?
V
O Attic shape! Fair attitude! with brede
Of marble men and maidens overwrought,
With forest branches and the trodden weed;
Thou, silent form, dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold Pastoral!
When old age shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say’st,
Beauty is truth, truth beauty, - that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.
— John Keats, born 1795 on All Hallows Eve, lived just 25 years
entire poem
|
31 October 2009

|
|