Taking back our lives
Live your life as if
truth, honor, and love were the most important things.
The corporate culture would have us believe that we owe them rent for
the privilege of being on the planet, that some pigs are more equal than
others, that it’s important to be royalty - as opposed to noble - and that
happiness is available for purchase.
My message to surburbanites: rototill your front lawn, grow vegetables, put up solar
panels, stay home more often, make things for yourself, and cut up your
credit cards.
— Jennifer Hathaway
|
1 August 2009

|
Science and mysticism
It’s only when we throw the full force of our logical minds at the
problems and fail that wonder is alive, when every brain cell is engaged
and still we cannot find our way through nature’s labyrinth that the
Great Mystery reigns. The moment we relinquish the effort, acknowledge
the uselessness of our logical brains, is the moment in which the
mystery dies.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
2 August 2009

|
In solidarity with their prisoners,
The Guards Revolt
Most histories understate revolt, overemphasize statesmanship, and
thus encourage impotency among citizens. When we look closely at
resistance movements, or even at isolated forms of rebellion, we
discover that class consciousness, or any other awareness of injustice,
has multiple levels. It has many ways of expression, many ways of
revealing itself-open, subtle, direct, distorted. In a system of
intimidation and control, people do not show how much they know, how
deeply they feel, until their practical sense informs them they can do
so without being destroyed...
The prisoners of the system will continue to rebel, as before, in ways
that cannot be foreseen, at times that cannot be predicted. The new fact
of our era is the chance that they may be joined by the guards. We
readers and writers of books have been, for the most part, among the
guards. If we understand that, and act on it, not only will life be more
satisfying, right off, but our grandchildren, or our great
grandchildren, might possibly see a different and marvelous world.
–
Howard Zinn
|
3 August 2009

|
Two fragments from a brilliant, erratic, short-lived poet
To suffer woes which Hope thinks infinite;
To forgive wrongs darker than death or night;
To defy power which seems omnipotent;
To love, and bear; to hope till Hope creates
From its own wreck the thing it contemplates.*
— from
Prometheus Unbound, by Percy Bysshe Shelley
*Ralph Vaughan Williams invoked these words to narrate his Symphonia
Antartica.
Listen
Rise like lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number.
Shake your chains to earth like dew,
Which in sleep had fall’n on you:
Ye are many — they are few.†
—from the
Masque of Anarchy, by Percy Bysshe Shelley, born this day in 1792
†Garment workers at the turn of the century chanted these words as
they sought more humane conditions and a living wage.
|
4 August 2009

|
Let there be light
AT DAWN, the world rises out of darkness, slowly, sense-grain by
grain, as if from sleep. Life becomes visible once again. “When it is
dark, it seems to me as if I were dying, and I can’t think anymore,”
Claude Monet once lamented. “More light!” Goethe begged from his
deathbed. Dawn is the wellspring of more light, the origin of our first
to last days as we roll in space, over 6.684 billion of us in one global
petri dish, shot through with sunlight, in our cells, in our minds, in
our myriad metaphors of rebirth, in all the extensions to our senses
that we create to enlighten our days and navigate our nights.
Thanks to electricity, night doesn’t last as long now, nor is it as dark
as it used to be, so it’s hard to imagine the terror of our ancestors
waiting for daybreak. On starless nights, one can feel like a loose
array of limbs and purpose, and seem smaller, limited to what one can
touch. In the dark, it’s hard to tell friend from foe. Night-roaming
predators may stalk us. Reminded of all our delectable frailties, we
become vulnerable as prey. What courage it must have taken our ancestors
to lie down in darkness and become helpless, invisible, and delusional
for eight hours. Graceful animals stole through the forest shadows by
night, but few people were awake to see them burst forth, in twilight or
moonlight, forbidding, distorted, maybe even ghoulish or magical. Small
wonder we personalized the night with demons. Eventually, people were
willing to sacrifice anything—wealth, power, even children—to ransom the
sun, immense with life, a one-eyed god who fed their crops, led their
travels, chased the demons from their dark, rekindled their lives.
— Diane Ackerman (read
more in Orion mag)
|
5 August 2009

|
Communication from a flying saucer
The trouble with earthlings is their early adulthood. As long
as they are young, they are lovable, open-hearted, tolerant, eager to
learn and to collaborate. They can even be induced to play with
one another. Most adults, however, are mortal enemies. The
only educational problem earth has is how to keep them young.
For life, evolution, progress, and adaptation to new situations, they
are useful only as long as they keep their youthful qualitities.
But the funny thing is that in all the educational institutions I
visited, the oject was to hasten maturity instead of delaying it.
Neoteny: the
retention by adults in a species, of traits associated with juveniles.
“The neotenous traits of the child 1. The need for love 2. Friendship 3.
Sensitivity 4. The need to think soundly 5. The need to know. 6. The
need to learn 7. The need to work 8. The need to organize 9. Curiosity
10. The sense of wonder 11. Playfulness 12. Imagination 13. Creativity
14. Open-mindedness 15. Flexibility 16. Experimental-mindedness 17.
Explorativeness 18. Resiliency 19. The sense of humor 20. Joyfulness 21.
Laughter and tears 22. Optimism 23. Honesty and trust 24. Compassionate
intelligence 25. Dance 26. Song”
– Ashley Montagu,
Growing Young (1989)
|
6 August 2009

|
The strangest dream
“Unquestionably, war-making is an aspect of human nature which will
continue as nations attempt to impose their will upon each other.”
‘Actually, this assertion is quite questionable. A recent decline in
war casualties—especially compared to historical and even prehistorical
rates—has some scholars wondering whether the era of international war
may be ending.’
It is estimated that in pre-historic tribal societies,
a person’s chances of dying in a war were one in four. The Dark
Ages were an improvement, and by the first half of the twentieth
century, the number was down below 10%, and in the second half, less
than 3%. Despite the horrors perpetrated by the Bush
Administration, the rate in the 21st Century is approaching 1%.
‘the evidence of a decline in war-related deaths shows that we
need not—and should not—accept war as an eternal scourge of the human
condition. In fact, this fatalistic view is wrong empirically and
morally... War clearly stems less from some hard-wired “instinct” than
from mutable cultural and environmental conditions; much can be done,
and has been done, to reduce the risks it poses...Our first step toward
ending war is to believe that we can end it.’
— John Horgan, writing in
Slate
‘The global proliferation of mass media...has
given...the world’s population a pretty clear idea of how previous
conflicts began...Once upon a time a charismatic, visionary regime with
uniforms designed by Hugo Boss could whip millions of people into doing
unspeakable things. But try it in the 21st Century, and people will call
you Adolf Hitler.’
|
7 August 2009

|
Each time I catch myself doing something to get it done...
God appears as ‘cosmic housekeeper’, pulling up the windowshades,
opening the doors to the morning light, revealing creative possibilities
within each day. When we bring a sense of the holy to even the
most mundane tasks, we become able to share consciously in the perpetual
renewal of Creation’s wonderful work. May we remain open to the
creative sparks we feel in people we encounter, in the world around us,
and within ourselves.
— Rami Shapiro
|
8 August 2009

|
The soft embrace of humility
Humility is not a comeuppance, a harsh lesson learned in order to cut
you down to size so that you will stop harming others. Rather, humility
is surrender to the soft embrace of trust. It is acceptance of
forgiveness that is already available. It is the realization that we are
surrounded by caring and competent others, so that our survival and the
prosperity of our extended family is assured whether or not we are able
to rise to our heroic aspirations.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
9 August 2009

|
Children offer a window into the nature of consciousness
Alison Gopnik argues that although young children’s thinking may seem
illogical and their play functionless, their imagination and exploration
actually reflect the operation of the same powerful causal learning
mechanisms that enable our uniquely human achievements in areas such as
science or art...Gopnik argues that the external consciousness of young
children is like a lantern rather than a spotlight (a metaphor
originally proposed by John Flavell)—children distribute their attention
more evenly across their environment, whereas adults focus on the things
they think are important and ignore the rest....
Certain activities might give adults a sense of what young
children’s conscious experience is like. Our external consciousness is
perhaps most like theirs when we are traveling in an unfamiliar country
or practicing a type of meditation that emphasizes clearing the mind and
being present in the moment. Our internal consciousness may be most like
theirs when we free-associate, or when random thoughts run through our
heads just before we fall asleep, or when we meditate by focusing on
observing our thoughts without controlling them. I don’t have space to
do justice to her arguments here, but if these analogies seem facile or
banal, trust me, they don’t in the original.
—
Ethan Remmel, book review in
American Scientist
...our own mental states are not perceived directly and infallibly
(as it seems to us) but are instead inferred using the same theory of
mind that we use to infer the mental states of others. So if our theory
of mind changes, our conscious experience could change with it.
read
Alison Gopnik’s article from Behavior and Brain Science
|
10 August 2009

|
A reason to be joyous
I notice I become anxious and watchful when I experience joy. I
don’t trust it. I wonder, where does it come from? Will it
last? Is it enough? Is this all the best life has to offer?
I’m working on letting it be. It’s so much more comfortable to
be working than to be joyous.
Listen to the Finale from Brahms trio Op 87, performed by the Moscow
Trio,
made available through
ClassicalArchives.com
|
11 August 2009

|
Man’s capacities have never been measured; nor are we to judge of
what he can do by any precedent, so little has been tried.
— H. D. Thoreau
|
12 August 2009

|
Bass ackwards
All animal bodies have the topology of a tube (torus). We pass food
through a digestive track. We have a
mouth at one end and an anus at the other.
In a very early stage of embryonic development, every animal starts
as a sphere (blastocyst)
comprising less than a hundred cells. Then the sphere dimples, to create a
tube.
In most primitive animals, the dimple is destined to become the mouth.
Biologists, who have a word for everything, call them
proteostomes.
The opposite of a proteostome is a
deuterostome,
characterized by blastocyst development in which the first dimple
eventually forms the anus. You and I and all mammals, birds,
reptiles and fish — we’re all deuterostomes, whereas insects and worms
and lobsters and clams are all proteostomes.
Most primitive animals are proteostomes.
The exception is the spiny sea creatures called
echinoderms:
starfish and sea urchins.
That’s how biologists know that you and I evolved from sea urchins.
Perhaps we’d rather be related to the octopus — genius of the
invertebrate world, or to social insects that are champion cooperators.
But alas, our ancestors were sea urchins. We know this because you
and I and the sea urchins are the only ones who build our guts from the
anus forward.
|
13 August 2009

|
Staying light
“An educated person is one who has figured out that information is at
best incomplete and very often false, misleading, fictitious,
mendacious, or just dead wrong.”
— Russell Baker, born this day in 1925, wrote 36 years of Op-Ed
columns for the New York Times during the Vietnam war, a nuclear arms
race, race riots, and a takeover of American politics by rabid
Republicans. He had his eyes wide open, sided reliably with the
underdogs, and yet he never lost his sense of humor or his appreciation
for human goodness.
Life is always walking up to us and saying, “Come on
in, the living’s fine,” and what do we do? Back off and take its
picture.
|
14 August 2009

|
Deciding to get out of bed
“If you once turn on your side after the hour at which you ought to
rise, it is all over”
– Sir Walter Scott
“The half hour between waking and rising has all my life proved
propitious to any task which was exercising my invention... It was
always when I first opened my eyes that the desired ideas thronged upon
me.”
– Sir Walter Scott
* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * *
*
Death is dreadful, but in the first springtime of youth, to be snatched
forcibly from the banquet to which the individual has but just sat down
is peculiarly appalling”
– Sir Walter Scott
“Death - the last sleep? No, it is the final awakening”
– Sir
Walter Scott, born this day in 1771
|
15 August 2009

|
Apropos of the subject I don’t want to think about...
There are two views of what death is that spring from two ideas about
the relationship between our souls and our brains. One view says
‘I am my brain. My sense of self is an illusion that sits on the
electrical activity of a hundred billion neurons.’ The other view
says ‘I own my brain. My consciousness has an existence of its
own, apart from the physical universe. (Of this I have direct
experience.) I created my body and brain as tools for engaging
with other souls and the physical world.’ The first view calls
itself ‘scientific’ or ‘rational’, the second, ‘mystical’, but this is a
pretension, and science really has nothing to say about this question.*
I don’t think clearly about death, but I offer a glimmer of insight
which I have gleaned recently. We don’t know if anything
remains of our consciousness after the demise of our nervous systems and our
bodies. We don’t know whether death is the end of all meaning and
all relation, and we don’t know whether the
desperate avoidance of death is justified. But one thing we might
understand is that the fear of death is part of a genetic program, with a
clear evolutionary purpose. For half a billion years now, animals
that were frightened by death received a shot of adrenaline with which
to fight or flee from a predator, and this helped them to leave more
offspring, and so the trait was passed on.
There are many other such traits which we recognize as atavisms, and
have successfully mastered. We are not slaves to our desire for
food or for sex. We have tamed our basest instincts with regard to
aggression, avoidance of pain, and penchant for inactivity. It is
perhaps the more impressive that we have not banished such feelings from
our experience, and yet we have brought them under rational control.
Whatever we decide that death is, whatever attitude we choose to take
in the face of death, we need not be paralyzed by the blinding fear that
is programmed into our genes from the ancient past.
— Josh Mitteldorf
* Experimental protocols must be public because they must be
reproducible, but my experience of self is private; thus no experiment
can convince me that my sense of self is an illusion.
Nevertheless, experiments that seem to demonstrate the reality of remote
viewing, precognition and telepathy might be taken as suggestive of the
opposite view: that part of the basis for our awareness is separate from
our physical selves.
|
16 August 2009

|
Turning math into music
In the tradition of
M. C. Escher
(1898-1972), who turned mathematics into art,
Bohuslav Martinu (1895-1959) turned math into music.
Martinu used repeated rhythmic patterns, different in each
instrument, to lay down a rich tapestry of sound that remains
interesting to the ear after many listenings...
or so it has seemed to me. I have worked with his
Madrigal Sonata for violin, flute and piano for the past three
months, listening hundreds of times, memorizing much of the piano part.
To me, the music (which I found abstract and inaccessible at first)
becomes more appealing the more I listen.
Curiously, I react in the opposite way to Escher’s work: I love to
look at it when it is new, but after I understand what he has done, I am
not drawn to spend a long time with it. I hope readers who are
more visually oriented than I will
tell me about different experiences.
|
17 August 2009

|
Biotech for life extension
The Science weekly of the
New York Times
reports today on tests of drugs that slow aging. Actually, we’re
already living twice as long as pre-industrial people lived. A lot
of that is just about controlling infectious disease, but in the last
30 years, there has been great benefit for older people. The
number of centenarians is exploding. There are many, many people
who are healthy and active in their 70’s - a rarity just a generation
ago.
Take care of yourself! and you just may live to get a big health
boost from technologies that are just around the corner.
Excitement among researchers on aging has picked up in
the last few years with the apparent convergence of two lines of
inquiry: single gene changes and the diet known as
caloric restriction.
The article goes on to talk about translating promising results for
life extension in animals into treatments for humans. Two drugs -
resveratrol and rapamycin are in the news lately, but there are many
others that work in animals, including metformin, deprenyl, and plain
aspirin.
|
18 August 2009

|
Shameful excuses of the gifted
The misery of us that are born great!
We are forced to woo, because none dare woo us;
And as a tyrant doubles with his words,
And fearfully equivocates, so we
Are forced to express our violent passions
In riddles and in dreams, and leave the path
Of simple virtue, which was never made
To seem the thing it is not.
— from the
Duchess
of Malfi, a play by
John Webster
(1580-1625)
‘I will remain the constant sanctuary of your good
name.’
|
19 August 2009

|
Remarks on change and attachment
what if a much of a which of a wind
gives the truth to summer’s lie;
bloodies with dizzying leaves
the sun
and yanks immortal stars awry?
Blow king to beggar and queen to seem
(blow friend to fiend: blow space to time)
–
when skies are hanged and oceans drowned,
the single secret will still be man
what if a keen of a lean wind flays
screaming hills with sleet and snow:
strangles valleys by ropes of thing
and stifles forests in white ago?
Blow hope to terror;
blow seeing to blind
(blow pity to envy and soul to mind)
–
whose hearts are mountains,
roots are trees,
it’s they shall cry
hello to the spring
what if a dawn of a doom of a dream
bites this universe in two,
peels forever out of his grave
and sprinkles nowhere with me and you?
Blow soon to never and never to twice
(blow life to isn’t; blow death to was)
–
all nothing’s only our hugest home;
the most who die, the more we live
— e. e. cummings
|
20 August 2009

Dali: Winter/Summer Patient Lovers
|
Co-creation of reality
‘Not once in the dim past, but continuously, by
conscious mind is the miracle of the Creation wrought.’
—
Sir Arthur Eddington
The author of this quote was not a starry-eyed mystic, but a
star-gazer of the scientific sort. Eddington (1882-1944) was a
staid and conservative man, planted in an era of scientific revolution.
At times, it appeared his role was to hold back the revelations of
quantum mechanics and relativity that were overturning scientific
expectations about stars and galaxies. When
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar’s equations predicted that no star bigger
than 1.4 times the size of the sun could indefinitely support itself
against gravity and must collapse into a black hole, Eddington used his
position of authority to make sure Chandra was not taken seriously.
Only a generation later was Chandra
spectacularly
vindicated.
In the above quote, what Eddington referred to is a phenomenon from
the (standard) Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. A
generation later, a more colorful physicist described this phenomenon in
terms of a game of 20 questions in which the person answering the
questions starts out without any object in mind
[John Archibald] Wheeler evokes what he calls the
“surprise” version of the old game of 20 questions. In the normal
version of the game, person A thinks of an object—animal, vegetable or
mineral—and person B tries to guess it with a series of yes-or-no
questions. In surprise 20 questions, A only decides what the object is
after B asks the first question. A can then keep choosing a new object,
as long as it is compatible with his previous answers. In the same way,
Wheeler suggests, reality is defined by the questions we put to it.
— from an obituary for Wheeler published last
year in
Scientific American
|
21 August 2009

|
The brain repairs itself
Japanese research group led by Professor Junichi Nabekura in National
Institute for Physiological Sciences found that, after
cerebral stroke in one side of the mouse brain, another side of the
brain rewires its neural circuits to recuperate from damaged neural
function.
The right side of the brain normally handles sensory stimuli from the
left leg, but when the circuit for responding to the left leg was
knocked out on the right side, a new one developed on the left side a
few weeks later.
...the left side of the brain rearranged
its neural circuits actively. After three to four weeks, the left side of
the brain became to receive sensory information from the left leg that is
usually received by the right side of the brain. In conclusion, the stroke
in the right side of the brain activated the rearrangement of the neural
circuits in the left side of the brain, and then these rearrangements helped
to recuperate from stroke-induced damaged neural function.
Science Blog article
The brain also rewires itself in response to
what we see,
what we
hear, and
what we think. Developing habits of directing our thoughts is
the most powerful thing we can do to transform ourselves and our role in
the world.
—JJM
|
22 August 2009

|
Your own physician, and your own pastor
At least 50% of the benefit of Western medical treatments derives
from the ‘placebo effect’: we are cured because we expect to be cured.
But once we know this, it undermines faith that is the source of our
benefit. Must we, then, live in illusion in order to be healed? No
– we advance from broken faith to the realization that we have the power
to heal within ourselves, and that the ‘placebo effect’ is but one
doorway to that power. We culture faith in our internal ability to heal,
and liberate ourselves from dependence on the doctor.
When we seek divine experience from a guru or a religious doctrine, the
benefit we derive is also dependent on a ‘placebo effect’: it is the
faith that we invest in a person or text outside ourselves that enables
us to have the profound and essential relationship to the All that we
seek. Knowing this is subversive, not only to the power of the priest,
but to our own ability to benefit from religious beliefs and practices.
But we may advance from that disillusionment toward self-reliance, and
invest in our internal lights an abiding faith, even as we deny faith in
doctrines, practices or saints.
– Josh Mitteldorf
|
23 August 2009

|
“We have all been brought up to believe that voting is crucial in
determining our destiny, that the most important act a citizen can
engage in is to go to the polls and choose one of the two mediocrities
who have already been chosen for us. It is a multiple choice test so
narrow, so specious, that no self-respecting teacher would give it to
students…Voting is easy and marginally useful, but it is a poor
substitute for democracy, which requires direct action by concerned
citizens.”
— Howard Zinn,
born this day in 1922
|
24 August 2009

|
The Self-Thinking Thought, on the Comments page of the NYTimes
Nathan Schneider has a
blog this morning with an unexceptional account of the Ontological
Proof (‘By definition, God is the greatest. A God that exists is
greater than a God that does not exist. Therefore God exists.’)
Far more interesting is the range of comments below the article.
Some excerpts:
the greatest concept I know of is called the
universe. It’s a big thing, we’re just beginning to define it. How did
it get here? Faced with the enormity of that mystery, it’s natural to
imagine what it would be like with no universe. Universe, no
universe–equally profound. Learn to love the mystery...
(Michael Melius)
If one’s relationship with God hinges upon a
certain distance and incompre-hensibility, does it not stand to reason
that flashes of illumination, in which all is made clear, so to speak,
threaten to efface God altogether? (Nick Kimbro)
I’d rather have a love affair with a deity that is
mysterious and makes demands of me than one that is nothing more than
the sum total of my self and and all of its abilities.
(Josh Mark)
God can only be experienced and I have. I cannot prove
to you that God exists. That is up to you.
(Jai Khosla)
What matters, as regarding the existence of God, is
the question of his nature. There is no answer to the unspeakably bad
things that happen to good people, other than to conclude that, if He
exists, it is not for our welfare.
(Morton Kaplan)
Some people believe in God, others believe in the
toothfairy. (Ashley)
Looking for proof is different than having faith. And
doubts. How difficult it is to keep faith working in your mind, in your
heart. Each of us has to work so hard to believe in something.
(Maria Teresa)
...to think you can wrap your finite mind around the
infinite through any method is one of the great conceits of humankind.
What if, gentle friends, it is all simply beyond knowing? Perhaps not
beyond all knowing, just beyond ours...
(Bill)
|
25 August 2009

Gary Larson
|
Skinning your knees on God
Little by little,
You will turn into stars.
Even then, my dear,
You will only be
A crawling infant,
Still skinning your knees on God.
Little by little,
You will turn into
The whole sweet, amorous Universe
In heat
On a wild spring night,
And become so free
In a wonderful, secret
And pour Love
That flows
From a conscious,
One-pointed
Infinite need for Light.
Even then, my dear,
The Beloved will have fulfilled
Just a fraction,
Just a fraction!
Of a promise
He wrote upon your heart.
When your soul begins
To Ever bloom and laugh
And spin in Eternal Ecstasy -
O little by little,
You will turn into God.
— from
I Hear God Laughing, Renderings of Hafiz by
Daniel Ladinsky
(With thanks to Joe Riley and
Panhala.net for so many Daily Inspirations.)
|
26 August 2009

|
The mind is a mansion, but most of the time we are content to live in
the lobby.
~ William Michaels
|
27 August 2009

|
It ain’t necessarily so
When we read that God spoke to Moses from a burning bush, it sounds
like a fairy tale. We read the Greek story of Athena appearing to
Telemachos in the form of Mentor as a myth, not a history. And
when Siva appears in human form, speaking to saints and peasants alike,
we think of it as a morality tale, concocted to instruct.
But what did the ancients think? Did contemporaries of these
texts think they were myths, or did they take them literally?
Julian Jaynes (1920-1997) was a man with
one book and one big idea.
We think of auditory hallucinations as a symptom of schizophrenia, but,
says Jaynes, these are common, and were much more so before they were
socialized away from us. Jaynes theorized that our sense of
being the command center of our own actions is quite new to history, and
that ancient people heard and obeyed voices in their heads that they
attributed to God or gods or ancestors or anthropomorphized nature.
...all of which raises the question whether they were crazy
or we are repressed. Are ecstatic visions and ‘speaking
in tongues’ the remnants of a much more natural relationship to God that
we have lost? Youtube lecture by Brian McVeigh,
Part I,
Part II
“Who am I?” The self is the answer. It is an entity or
structure of attributes given by our culture and imbedded in our
language that is learned into our personal history which we infer from
two sources: what other people tell us we are and what we infer from our
own behavior. Many recent experiments in social psychology provide
evidence for this statement. The self is not in any sense the analog ‘I’
which is contentless. The self is an object of consciousness, not
consciousness itself. As such, the self is not a stable construction,
but changes dramatically through history and among nations, as well as
in child development, and even over the course of a day, depending on
one’s excerpts and how one narratizes them.
— from
Consciousness and the Voices of the Mind
|
28 August 2009

|
Efficiency inching ever up
A research group in photovoltaics at University of New South Wales
reported yesterday a new, multi-layer solar cell with overall efficiency
of 43%. 43% of the light that falls on the cell is turned into
electricity, equivalent to about 500 watts per square meter. For
comparison, thirty years ago the best efficiencies available were still
in the single digits.
At this rate, the roof of an average suburban house covered with
solar cells could generate electricity for several houses in the
neighborhood. The city of Sydney could get the power it needs from
a solar farm in the desert 5 miles x 5 miles.
As solar cells continue to get better and cheaper while oil becomes
more expensive and more scarce, it is inevitable that solar cells become
the more economical option.
43% article at PhysOrg
Solar Panels Drop in Price from the NYTimes
|
29 August 2009

|
Who am I?
I am eternal and indestructible.
I am ephemeral, constructed from moment to moment: one
slip from biochemical homeostasis and I am gone forever.
Cogito ergo sum. My thoughts and inner experience are the most
substantial and dependable reality I know.
I am nothing – at most an illusion.
I am solidity, my main point of reference. I am the measure of
all things, the first and most important subject of my inquiry.
I am an epiphenomenon of the activity in my nervous
system.
I am the consciousness that created my body and my nervous system
to realize my ambitions.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
30 August 2009

|
‘Establishing lasting peace is the work of education; all politics
can do is keep us out of war.
— Maria Montessori, born this day in 1870
“Never help a child with a task at which he feels he
can succeed.”
|
31 August 2009

|
|