Peaches and cream
The revolt of the oppressed against their oppressors is as old as
class society. The earliest recorded strike was of the Egyptian pyramid
builders. In Rome we had the revolt of the slaves under that marvelous
revolutionary Spartacus. In the Middle Ages the peasants revolted
against the corvée and other feudal impositions. In England the peasants
rose up and
seized London in 1381. In Germany the Peasant War was
chronicled by Engels, who pointed to the communist tendencies in the
teachings of Thomas Muentzer and the
Anabaptists.
The forerunners of modern socialism could never bring about the new
and equal society that they dreamed of, because the material basis for a
classless society did not exist. Thus, the early revolutionary movements
of the masses directed against the old oppressors could only serve as
the means whereby a new class of exploiters established itself in power.
— Alan Woods
For thousands of years of human history, utopian
aspiration was ahead
of economic means. But finally in the twenty-first century, technology has leapfrogged ahead of ideology. For
the first time, we have the means to create a world where there is
enough to go around, where oppression is not a necessary precondition to
comfort. But the centuries of shortage are fresh in our memories,
the rivalries and the cycles of vengeance have a life of their own, and
must be soothed from our souls before we are ready for the Promised
Land.
— Josh Mitteldorf
Capitalism contains inherent contradictions which inevitably lead to
economic crisis.
— Karl Marx
‘When the revolution comes, we’ll all eat peaches and cream.’
— Morris Moshinsky
|
1 May 2009

|
“Trust yourself. You know more than you think you do.”
— Dr Benjamin Spock, born this day in 1903, helped a generation
of American parents and their children to feel good about themselves.
|
2 May 2009

|
Steal this joy!
Identify what it is that makes you ecstatically happy, then steal it.
Not the object, but the happiness. No one is the poorer when you
have learned to call forth the happiness that resides within you.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
3 May 2009

|
Inside the baby’s mind
It’s unfocused, distractible, and extremely good at what it does.
This new understanding of baby cognition, and the peculiar ways in
which babies pay attention, is giving scientists insights into improving
the mental functioning of adults. The ability to direct attention, it
turns out, doesn’t merely inhibit irrelevant facts and perceptions - it
can also stifle the imagination. Sometimes, the mind performs best when
we don’t try to control it.
—
Boston Globe article
‘Genius is but childhood recovered at will.’
«Le génie n’est que l’enfance retrouvée à volonté.»
— Baudelaire
|
4 May 2009

|
All the time in the world
A billion years ago, when you implanted the first nuclear membrane in
the first eukaryotic cell, laying the foundation for multicellular life,
impatience was nowhere in your process.
So what if it takes another thousand years to establish utopian peace
and universal human empathy?
— Josh Mitteldorf
“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must
be lived forwards.”
— Søren Kierkegaard, born this day in 1813
|
5 May 2009

|
What’s it like to be a human?
What’s it like to be a human
the bird asked
I myself don’t know
it’s being held prisoner by your skin
while reaching infinity
being a captive of your scrap of time
while touching eternity
being hopelessly uncertain
and helplessly hopeful
being a needle of frost
and a handful of heat
breathing in the air
and choking wordlessly
It’s being on fire
with a nest made of ashes
eating bread
while filling up on hunger
it’s dying without love
it’s loving through death
That’s funny said the bird
and flew effortlessly up through the air
~
Anna Kamieńska (1920-1986) ~
from
Astonishments, tr Grazyna Drabik & David Curzon
|
6 May 2009

|
The best is yet to be
Grow old along with me!
The best is yet to be,
The last of life, for which the first was made:
Our times are in His hand
Who saith “A whole I planned,
Youth shows but half; trust God: see all, nor be afraid!”
– Robert Browning, born this day in 1812
|
7 May 2009

|
Committed to empirical science, even when it leads us to
strange places
Madeleine Ennis, a pharmacologist at Queen’s University, Belfast, was
the scourge of homeopathy. She railed against its claims that a chemical
remedy could be diluted to the point where a sample was unlikely to
contain a single molecule of anything but water, and yet still have a
healing effect. Until, that is, she set out to prove once and for all
that homeopathy was bunkum.
In her most recent paper, Ennis describes how her team looked at the
effects of ultra-dilute solutions of histamine on human white blood
cells involved in inflammation. These ‘basophils’ release histamine when
the cells are under attack. Once released, the histamine stops them
releasing any more. The study, replicated in four different labs, found
that homeopathic solutions - so dilute that they probably didn’t contain
a single histamine molecule - worked just like histamine. Ennis might
not be happy with the homeopaths’ claims, but she admits that an effect
cannot be ruled out.
So how could it happen? Homeopaths prepare their remedies by dissolving
things like charcoal, deadly nightshade or spider venom in ethanol, and
then diluting this "mother tincture" in water again and again. No matter
what the level of dilution, homeopaths claim, the original remedy leaves
some kind of imprint on the water molecules. Thus, however dilute the
solution becomes, it is still imbued with the properties of the remedy.
You can understand why Ennis remains sceptical. And it remains true that
no homeopathic remedy has ever been shown to work in a large randomised
placebo-controlled clinical trial. But the Belfast study (Inflam
Res 53:181) suggests that something is going on. ‘We are,’ Ennis
says in her paper, ‘unable to explain our findings and are reporting
them to encourage others to investigate this phenomenon.’ If the results
turn out to be real, she says, the implications are profound: we may
have to rewrite physics and chemistry.
—
New Scientist article by Michael Brooks
|
8 May 2009

|
Is happiness what is left over after we trim away the pursuit of
despondence?
— read more at
ehard’s blog
|
9 May 2009

|
How to live - the big questions
(Reflections on my 60th birthday)
There is some wisdom I have absorbed and feel comfortable with.
I understand that gratification of personal desires, like acquiring
material wealth, leads only to emptiness. I feel comfortable with a life
committed to non-violence, intimate connection, and service to others.
I have been blessed to experienced some of the freedom and joy that such
a life offers.
I am strong when I have rules, and I do well with discipline, so when I can reduce an insight to a rule for living, I am often
successful. But there are some areas where it is not so easy to
reprogram my behavior because judgment is required, and no simple rule
will suffice. Here are three questions that continue to leave me
perplexed:
- When and how is it helpful to interrupt violence, to stand
up for those who are being oppressed? All too often, I wish to
intervene as a peacekeeper, but find myself just becoming one more
party to the conflict.
- When people are harming themselves, it seems especially
dangerous to intervene. The initial effect is almost always to incur
the annoyance (or worse) of a friend, and I’ve destroyed friendships
by being too helpful. Nevertheless, when the relationship can
support it, the loving intervention of a friend can occasionally
have a powerful benefit — I’ve experienced that, too(from both
sides). I’ve learned that when people come to me for advice,
it is generally a sounding board that they want, not a prescription.
But I would like better to recognize those rare occasions when it is
possible to express an uncomfortable truth powerfully and lovingly.
- Resolving to serve and to give can lead to paradox: There are
others who want to give as well. Generosity can turn to
passive aggression. Giving can breed resentment in the
recipient, and serving can deprive others of the opportunity to
serve. Are there times when the right way to serve is to stand
aside and allow someone else to serve?
Allowing others the chance to give to me has been particularly
difficult for me. I feel caught between a wish to acknowledge
generosity and fundamental commitment to an honesty
which might be hideously impolite.
Sometimes it seems that the only honest solution is to grow to a
place where I can genuinely feel gratitude.
— Josh Mitteldorf, born this day in 1949
|
10 May 2009

|
Without pretension
The world rewards people who play the game, who flatter and say
conventional things in charming ways, who support the power and
authority of those who already have power and authority. We are
intrigued by Richard Feynman because he was the exception. He said
and did whatever he wanted, and he was so objectively brilliant that
that could not interfere with his success.
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first
principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest
person to fool.
— Richard Feynman, born this day in 1918
‘As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way:
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.’
|
11 May 2009

|
Hidden Gems
We know not what lies in us, till we seek.
Men dive for pearls—they are not found on shore;
The hillsides, most unpromising and bleak,
Do sometimes hide the ore.
Go, dive in the vast ocean of thy mind,
O man! far down below the noisy waves,
Down in the depths and silence thou mayst find
Rare pearls and coral caves.
Sink thou a shaft into a mine of thought;
Be patient, like the seekers after gold,
Under the rocks and rubbish lieth what
May bring thee wealth untold.
Reflected from the vasty Infinite,
However dulled by earth, each human mind
Holds somewhere gems of beauty and of light
Which, seeking, thou shalt find.
Helen
Wheeler Wilcox (1850-1919)
|
12 May 2009

|
Reincarnation in Christianity
The early Christian church accepted the doctrine of reincarnation,
which was expounded by the
Gnostics and numerous church fathers, including
Clement of Alexandria, the celebrated
Origen (both
3rd Century) and
St. Jerome
(5th Century). The doctrine was first declared a heresy in AD 553
by the Second Council
of Constantinople. At that time, many Christians thought the
doctrine of reincarnation afforded man too ample a stage of time and
space to encourage him to strive for immediate salvation.
— Paramahansa
Yogananda
|
13 May 2009

|
Voodoo
Late one night in a small Alabama cemetery, Vance Vanders had a
run-in with the local witch doctor, who wafted a bottle of
unpleasant-smelling liquid in front of his face, and told him he was
about to die and that no one could save him.
Back home, Vanders took to his bed and began to deteriorate. Some weeks
later, emaciated and near death, he was admitted to the local hospital,
where doctors were unable to find a cause for his symptoms or slow his
decline. Only then did his wife tell one of the doctors, Drayton
Doherty, of the hex.
Doherty thought long and hard. The next morning, he called Vanders’s
family to his bedside. He told them that the previous night he had lured
the witch doctor back to the cemetery, where he had choked him against a
tree until he explained how the curse worked. The medicine man had, he
said, rubbed lizard eggs into Vanders’s stomach, which had hatched
inside his body. One reptile remained, which was eating Vanders from the
inside out.
Great ceremony
Doherty then summoned a nurse who had, by prior arrangement, filled a
large syringe with a powerful emetic. With great ceremony, he inspected
the instrument and injected its contents into Vanders’s arm. A few
minutes later, Vanders began to gag and vomit uncontrollably. In the
midst of it all, unnoticed by everyone in the room, Doherty produced his
pièce de résistance - a green lizard he had stashed in his black bag.
“Look what has come out of you Vance,” he cried. “The voodoo curse is
lifted.”
Vanders did a double take, lurched backwards to the head of the bed,
then drifted into a deep sleep. When he woke next day he was alert and
ravenous. He quickly regained his strength and was discharged a week
later.
—
Article
by Helen Pilcher, New Scientist
|
14 May 2009

|
Deep question, deep answer
I examine the
contents and motivation of my mind during meditation. I have learned
that I am not highly motivated on behalf of my own happiness. If there
were a pill that would help me be happy all the time with no side-effects, it would not
attract me at all. Modifying my habits and disciplines in a way that
will make me happier more of the time holds some appeal for me, but it
is not at all compelling.
Here is my
question: Suppose I learn that what I am seeking is actually making
me unhappy. I may discover that I am motivated by wanting to best
others in subtle ways, or to seek fame and recognition for myself, or to
entreat selected others for affection and attention when they really
have little of either to offer me. Do I use this insight to
deprogram myself, to squelch behaviors that are deluded and subtly
self-destructive? Should I attempt to right my course by steering
toward a set of habits more conducive to my own happiness and
longterm wellbeing?
Here is my
answer: To declare that my own happiness is a more worthy goal than
these others which I find myself pursuing is itself an arbitrary
judgment. In any case, heroic acts of will are likely to engender
reaction and resistance. So my path is not to decide on worthy
goals nor to hold myself to a strict discipline in their pursuit.
Rather, I trust my process of growth and transformation based on
insight. It will happen beneath my conscious awareness, and
without my willing it. Pursuing these revelations about my own
motives and inner workings is not a mere step on the way toward
correcting my misdirections; rather, pursuit of insight is sufficient
unto itself. I will continue on this path, and entrust the rest to
an inner capacity for enlightened self-direction.
— JJM
|
15 May 2009
|
Hope is like a road in the country; there was never a road, but when
many people walk on it, the road comes into existence.
- Lin Yutang
(1895-1976)
|
16 May 2009

|
Take charge
Making a conscious determination how you will direct your
attention is the most powerful and also the most difficult undertaking
of your life. First, plumb your deepest values to decide on what you
wish to focus. Then you will become aware of the myriad external
distractions. Lights and noises are relatively easy, but our
environment is overloaded with stimuli that have engineered to grab our
attention for commercial purposes, and detaching from these is much more
difficult. After this, you will have to come to terms with the
inner distractions which are yet more insidious. They have not been
designed by psychology consultants to be irresistible to the average
American brain; rather they have evolved in your own brain, and have
risen to the top because they are the most compelling and irresistible
for your unique interests and history and addictions.
The reward is not simply greater ownership of your mind. It is the power
to direct a process of change from the inside out.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
17 May 2009

|
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth – more than ruin
– more even than death... Thought is subversive and revolutionary,
destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established
institutions, and comfortable habit. Thought looks into the pit of hell
and is not afraid. Thought is great and swift and free, the light of the
world, and the chief glory of man.
— Bertrand Russell, born this day in 1872
The man who created symbolic logic and marched against every major
war of the Twentieth Century also had a sense of perspective:
One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown
is the belief that one’s work is terribly important. |
18 May 2009

|
How many mothers does it take?
Sarah Hrdy argues that human cooperation is rooted not in war making,
as sociobiologists have believed, but in baby making and baby-sitting.
Hrdy’s conception of early human society is far different from the
classic sociobiological view of a primeval nuclear family, with dad off
hunting big game and mom tending the cave and the kids. Instead, Hrdy
paints a picture of a cooperative breeding culture in which parenting
duties were spread out across a network of friends and relatives. The
effect on our development was profound.
— Julia Wallace,
Salon.com book review
Raising children in nuclear families has done enough
damage. It is time for communal living to become the norm.
Maybe the coming economic slump will help.
|
19 May 2009

|
Just don’t think about it
‘Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so.’
‘That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief
danger of the time’
— John Stuart Mill, born this day in 1806
|
20 May 2009

|
Praise What Comes
surprising as unplanned kisses, all you haven’t deserved
of days and solitude, your body’s immoderate good health
that lets you work in many kinds of weather. Praise
talk with just about anyone. And quiet intervals, books
that are your food and your hunger; nightfall and walks
before sleep. Praising these for practice, perhaps
you will come at last to praise grief and the wrongs
you never intended. At the end there may be no answers
and only a few very simple questions: did I love,
finish my task in the world? Learn at least one
of the many names of God? At the intersections,
the boundaries where one life began and another
ended, the jumping-off places between fear and
possibility, at the ragged edges of pain,
did I catch the smallest glimpse of the holy?
— Jeanne Lohmann, from
The Light of Invisible Bodies
|
21 May 2009

|
The Wisdom of Sherlock
Everyone knows that news organs and even scientific journals are
subject to political influence. But that awareness just lulled me into a
false sense of my own independence for most of my life. It’s been
a theme of the last several years that I’m discovering ways in which my
own beliefs have been swept along by the scientific consensus and the
newspapers I had come to count on.
So I find myself quoting Sherlock these days:
‘Once
you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how
improbable, must be the truth.’
The point is that there are some things I’m sure of; basic
science I learned in high school takes me a long way. If I build
on that certainty then my former judgments fall away, when they have
been based on ‘they can’t all be deceived’, or ‘how could it be that no
one called them on that?’ or ‘so many people smarter than I am believe...’
‘It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has
data.’
— Arthur Conan Doyle, 150 years old today
|
22 May 2009

|
From love junkie to universal love
There is a path from the tortured clinging of Western romantic love
to the selfless expansion envisioned by
Kierkegaard and
Gandhi.
Lester Levenson charted that path after his doctors gave him up for
dead, and gave to us the emotional clearing techniques known as the
Sedona Method.
I sensed that the closest thing related to happiness was love. So I
began reviewing and reliving my past love affairs, looking at the points
where the little happiness that I had were. I began to pull up and
dissect all my high moments of loving.
Suddenly, I got an inkling that it was when I was loving that I had the
highest feeling!
I remembered one evening, a beautiful balmy evening, in the mountains
when I was camping with Virginia. We were both lying on the grass, both
looking up at the sky, and I had my arm around her. The nirvana, the
perfection of the height of happiness was right there. I was feeling how
great is love for Virginia! How wonderful is knowing all this nature!
How perfect a setting!
Then I saw that it was my loving her that was the cause of this
happiness! Not the beauty of the setting, or being with Virginia....
Then I immediately turned to the other side. Boy it was great when
she loved me! I remembered the moment when publicly this beautiful,
charming girl told the world that she approved of Lester, she loved
Lester—and I could feel that nice feeling of approval. But I sensed that
it was not as great as what I had just discovered. It was not a lasting
feeling. It was just for the moment. In order for me to have that
feeling continuously, she had to continue saying that.
So, this momentary ego approval was not as great as the feeling of
loving her! As long as I was loving her, I felt so happy. But when she
loved me, there were only moments of happiness when she gave me
approval...
This insight on love,
seeing that happiness was determined by my capacity to love, was a
tremendous insight. It began to free me, and any bit of freedom when
you’re plagued feels so good. I knew that I was going in the right
direction. I had gotten hold of a link of the chain of happiness and was
determined not to let go until I had the entire chain.
— Lester Levenson
|
23 May 2009

|
How much is too much?
Pushing our bodies to the limit is good for longevity and builds
courage for every aspect of life. Pushing the wrong way leads to
injury. How do you know when to stop?
It would be nice to say, ‘Listen to your body! Trust your internal
sense.’ Listening to the body is important, but for
optimizing health and longevity, it is also important to learn when to
override the body’s signals.
It is precisely stress and challenge that leads to vibrant health
and longevity. Your body will ask you to stop, and you must know
better.
Exercise that is comfortable is better than no exercise, but it is
far from optimal.
Some tips:
- Running is hard on the joints. Long distance running
generates endorphins that numb you to the damage you are doing, and
it is easy to injure yourself. Don’t rely on running as your
main form of exercise.
- You can’t beat swimming.
- Exercise consistently and build up slowly. Don’t try
something that’s far beyond your usual routine without building up
to it over a period of weeks.
- Sprints that feel like you’re dying are powerfully energizing
and great for long-term health. Swim as fast as you can or
work out on the elliptical machine or do calisthenics for 4 minutes
all-out, while your body is screaming for relief. You should
be panting for several minutes after it is over. On alternate
days, go 20% faster than your 4-minute pace for 90 seconds.
- Sprinting before a meal is a great discipline, and damps the
insulin surge that comes with the meal This is one of the best
ways to avoid
metabolic syndrome and to slow aging.
- Kundalini yoga exercises
are brilliantly designed to make you feel like you really, really
want to stop long before your body really gives out. Kundalini
practice builds courage.
- Don’t worry about heart attacks. Heart attacks from
over-exertion are rare, but make for spectacular news coverage.
It is much, much more likely that you will prevent a heart attack by
keeping yourself fit than that you will induce a heart attack by
overexertion.
Stretch your limits. Expand your goals for yourself gradually
over time. Compete with no one but yourself.
— Josh Mitteldorf
|
24 May 2009

|
On being asked, ‘Whence is the flower?’
The Rhodora
In May, when sea-winds pierced our solitudes,
I found the fresh Rhodora in the woods,
Spreading its leafless blooms in a damp nook,
To please the desert and the sluggish brook.
The purple petals, fallen in the pool,
Made the black water with their beauty gay;
Here might the red-bird come his plumes to cool,
And court the flower that cheapens his array.
Rhodora! if the sages ask thee why
This charm is wasted on the earth and sky,
Tell them, dear, that if eyes were made for seeing,
Then Beauty is its own excuse for being:
Why thou wert there, O rival of the rose!
I never thought to ask, I never knew:
But, in my simple ignorance, suppose
The self-same Power that brought me there brought you.
—Ralph Waldo Emerson, born this day in 1803
|
25 May 2009

|
Bacteria have a communal life
Bacteria are the simplest living organisms. We’re used to
thinking of bacteria as single cells, living on their own, but many
bacteria have a double life. They can form into communities with
many mutually-adapted species, each performing its unique function to
create an environment conducive to all. Species that cannot
tolerate oxygen, for example, will live shielded by species that gobble
up oxygen. Waste from one species will be nourishment for another.
These are biofilms,
and they are ubiquitous — on shower tiles and in pond scum, in the hot
pools of Yellowstone and on frozen Antarctic glaciers.
The biofilm is held together by an
extracellular matrix. Bacteria do their part to excrete the
adhesives that keep the film where it belongs, and the structural web
that gives it strength.
These are tight ecosystems. The remarkable thing is how well
simple bacteria are adapted to communal living.
How does the community defend itself from invasion by other bacteria
that might mooch on the sheltered environment, suck up the nutrients,
but not contribute to building or upkeep?
How did so many species, each of which is capable of living
independently, acquire the adaptations that make them so supportive of
each other in the biofilm environment?
We might extrapolate and guess that macroscopic
ecosystems are even more mutually adapted, exquisitely crafted for the
stability of the ecosystem as a whole in a grand process of
co-evolution.
|
26 May 2009

|
What we want
What we want
is never simple.
We move among the things
we thought we wanted:
a face, a room, an open book
and these things bear our names—
now they want us.
But what we want appears
in dreams, wearing disguises.
We fall past,
holding out our arms
and in the morning
our arms ache.
We don’t remember the dream,
but the dream remembers us.
It is there all day
as an animal is there
under the table,
as the stars are there
even in full sun.
— Linda Pastan,
77 years old today
|
27 May 2009

|
So, this is God...
As a reader and a seeker, I always get frustrated at this moment in somebody
else’s spiritual memoirs — that moment in which the soul excuses itself
from time and space and merges with the infinite. From the Buddha to
Saint Teresa to the Sufi mystics to my own Guru — so many great souls
over the centuries have tried to express in so many words what it feels
like to become one with the divine, but I’m never quite satisfied by
these descriptions. Often you will see the maddening adjective
indescribable used to describe the event. But even the most eloquent
reporters of the devotional experience — like Rumi, who wrote about
having abandoned all effort and tied himself to God’s sleeve, or Hafiz,
who said that he and God had become like two fat men living in a small
boat—‘we keep bumping into each other and laughing’ — even those poets
leave me behind. I don’t want to read about it; I want to feel it, too.
Sri Ramana Maharshi, a beloved Indian Guru, used to give long talks on
the transcendental experience to his pupils and then always wrap it up
with this instruction: ‘Now go find out.’
So now I have found out. And I don’t want to say that what I
experienced that Thursday afternoon in India was indescribable, even
though it was. I’ll try to explain anyway. Simply put, I got pulled
through the wormhole of the Absolute, and in that rush I suddenly
understood the workings of the universe completely. I left my body, I
left the room, I left the planet, I stepped through time and I entered
the void. I was inside the void, but I also was the void and I was
looking at the void, all at the same time. The void was a place of
limitless peace and wisdom. The void was conscious and it was
intelligent. The void was God, which means that I was inside God. But
not in a gross, physical way — not like I was Liz Gilbert stuck inside
a chuck of God’s thigh muscle. I just was part of God. In addition to
being God. I was both a tiny piece of the universe and exactly the same
size as the universe. (‘All know that the drop merges into the ocean,
but few know that the ocean merges into the drop,’ wrote the sage Kabir
— and I can personally attest now that this is true.)
It wasn’t hallucinogenic, what I was feeling. It was the most basic
of events. It was heaven, yes. It was the deepest love I’d ever
experienced, beyond anything I could have previously imagined, but it
wasn’t euphoric. It wasn’t exciting. There wasn’t enough ego or passion
left in me to create euphoria or excitement. It was just obvious. Like
when you’ve been looking at an optical illusion for a long time,
straining your eyes to decode the trick, and suddenly your cognizance
shifts and there — now you can clearly see it! — the vase is
actually two faces. And once you’ve seen through the optical illusion,
you can never not see it again.
‘So this is God,’ I thought. ‘Congratulations to meet you.’*
The place in which I was standing can’t be described like an earthly
location. It was neither dark nor light, neither big nor small. Nor was
it a place, nor was I technically standing there, nor was I exactly ‘I’
anymore. I still had my thoughts, but they were so modest, quiet and
observatory. Not only did I feel unhesitating compassion and unity with
everything and everybody, it was vaguely and amusingly strange for me to
wonder how anybody could feel anything but that. I also felt mildly
charmed by all my old ideas about who I am and what I’m like. I’m a
woman, I come from America, I’m talkative, I’m a writer — all this felt
so cute and obsolete. Imagine cramming yourself into such a puny box of
identity when you could experience your infinitude instead.
I wondered, ‘Why have I been chasing happiness my whole life when bliss
was here the entire time?’
— from Eat,
Pray, Love by Elizabeth Gilbert
* In the book, Gilbert is greeted this way by people she meets in
India.
|
28 May 2009

|
Kennedy on Peace
“Peace is a daily, a weekly, a monthly process, gradually changing
opinions, slowly eroding old barriers, quietly building new
structures...
Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.
Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking
about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth
living.”
— John F. Kennedy, born this day in 1917
|
29 May 2009

|
Grow your own
Elysia chlorotica is a sea slug that does the same trick as green
plants, turning sunlight into food for itself. Part of the way it
does this trick is that it eats algae, then processes the algae cells
selectively. The part of each cell that performs photosynthesis is
an organelle called a
chloroplast. Elysia can digest the algae,
but retain the chloroplast intact. The chloroplasts are hosted in
her/his* own intestinal cells, where they grow and reproduce and do the
job of growing food for the slug.
But stealing the chloroplasts was the easy part. Maintaining
and growing them requires a whole suite of chemical supports that plants
have and animals generally don’t. Elysia has the instructions for
these chemicals in her/his DNA. Since they are identical to the
corresponding genes in plants, it is considered unlikely that sea slugs
evolved them independently. Instead, the slugs copied the genes,
probably from the algae they eat, at some point in their past and
permanently incorporated the genes into their own DNA. This is
horizontal gene transfer, and it greatly expands the concept of
‘evolution by descent’ that has been the standard assumption of
evolutionary biologists since Darwin.
And how does horizontal gene transfer work? How is it that one
can permanently acquire new genes that were not present in either of
one’s parents? This is, in part, an open question. It must
be a rare event, or it would wreak havoc with biology. Only very
occasionally are genes acquired from a distant species expected to be
useful. One theory is that viruses pick up genes from one species
and can insert them into the genome of another.
More on
horizontal gene transfer.
Short movie
with different kinds of colorful sea slugs
More on Elysia
from U of Maine
*Sea slugs are hermaphroditic, with both male and female sex organs.
|
30 May 2009

|
Contingency and determinism
The world has reasons that we will discover within our lifetime of
search and analysis, and others that will remain mysterious even as we
die; but until we expand our minds to the limit, we will never know what
new understandings are possible.
Attribute nothing to chance, any more than you would dismiss an event
as ‘God’s will’.
— Josh Mitteldorf
(It’s true that the standard interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
includes pure, irreducible randomness, but there are other models in
which quantum randomness is not truly random.)
|
31 May 2009

|
|