20 November 2005
There is a source within,
speaking with intuition, insight and wisdom. It is a soft and subtle voice,
generally drowned out by the din of our worldly activities. How can we
become better listeners? One essential step is to stem the flow of words.
The translation of thought into word, and the habit of reasoning verbally
are essentially useful, but cut us off from our source.
Buddhist monks will take a
vow of silence for a time. Rest and solitude have restorative value that
most of us recognize. Music, vigorous exercise, or repetition of a mantra
can crowd out the verbalizations that have become our brain’s dominant
mode.
Looking at a bonobo or an
elephant or dolphin, I sometimes try to imagine the immediacy of their
intuitions, in a constant state of preverbal consciousness.
~Josh Mitteldorf

|
19 November 2005
"It seems to me now
that mathematics is capable of an artistic excellence as great as that of any music,
perhaps greater; not because the pleasure it gives (although very pure) is comparable, either
in intensity or in the number of people who feel it, to that of music, but because it gives
in absolute perfection that combination, characteristic of great art, of godlike freedom, with
the sense of inevitable destiny; because, in fact, it constructs an ideal world where everything
is perfect but true."
~ Bertrand
Russell, Autobiography
Other
quotes on mathematics as art
|
18 November 2005
"Knowing
you are fulfilling your destiny because you want to, rather than because you
have to, can make a difference. When you are freed from obligation,
obstacles in your way become challenges to be overcome, and the journey
becomes an adventure rather than the obligatory steps you are being forced
to take."
- from the Daily
Om
|
17 November 2005
"...The first point is that
the enormous usefulness of mathematics in the natural sciences is something
bordering on the mysterious and that there is no rational explanation for
it. Second, it is just this uncanny usefulness of mathematical concepts that
raises the question of the uniqueness of our physical theories...The great
mathematician fully, almost ruthlessly, exploits the domain of permissible
reasoning and skirts the impermissible. That his recklessness does not lead
him into a morass of contradictions is a miracle in itself... quite comparable in its striking nature to...the two miracles of the existence of laws of nature and of the human mind's capacity to divine them."
~from The
Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences, by Eugene
Wigner, born this day in 1902
(Wigner made many
contributions to physics and the philosophy of science. He is perhaps
best known for combining the algebra of symmetries with quantum mechanics,
in order to create a framework for understanding the physics of crystals.)
In Wigner's day, physicists
were way out on a limb of abstraction, bolstered and encouraged by the fact
that quantum mechanics makes striking predictions that are confirmed in
atomic physics, in physical chemistry, and in particle experiments.
Encouraged by that success, physicists of today are much further out on a
limb, with theories of 11-dimensional space and unseen forms of matter and
energy – theories that may never be testable in any experiment. I
wonder what Wigner would say?
|
16 November 2005
"People
will take responsibility for authority over their own minds, worshipping by
wondering about the natural laws to which we are all subject. Nurtured by
this progressive spirituality, we will look upon the natural world as a
house of worship, the book of nature as sacred scripture, the laws of nature
as God’s commandments, the resonant effects of thoughts on the human
organism as the voice of God...and our lives will be our
prayers."
from God
without Religion, by Sankara
Saranam
|
15 November 2005
Resolve to Be
Impeccable With Your Word
Speak with integrity. Say
only what you mean. Avoid using the word to speak against yourself or gossip
about others. Use the power of your word in the direction of truth and love.
Number One from
The Four
Agreements, by Miguel
Ruiz
|
14 November 2005
"Liberals say we should
end employment discrimination. I say we should end employment. Conservatives
support right-to-work laws. Following Karl Marx's wayward son-in-law Paul
Lafargue, I support the right to be lazy. Leftists favor full
employment. Like the surrealists – except that I'm not kidding – I favor
full unemployment. Trotskyists agitate for permanent revolution. I agitate
for permanent revelry."
~ Bob
Black
|
|